Effects of Body Size on the Predator‐Prey Interaction Between Pumpkinseed Sunfish and Gastropods

Body size is known to play a critical role in determining patterns of prey selection. In this study, we examined the diets of pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) from three Michigan lakes. Pumpkinseeds have highly developed pharyngeal jaws specialized for crushing gastropods, and in our study lakes gastropods consistently contributed >80% of the prey mass in pumpkinseed diets. However, the average dietary composition and prey selection among snail taxa and size classes varied considerably among dates and sites. We hypothesized that this variation was influenced by changes in the size structure of the snail community. We used laboratory studies to quantify the effect of snail (and fish) size on three important components of the predator—prey interaction: encounter rates, attack probabilities, and capture successes. We then used these laboratory data to predict prey selection observed in the field. For most of our field situations, a simple model based on size—specific encouter rates only) explained a large percent (71%) of the observed variation in prey selection. However, in those cases where some of the snails were resistant to predation, due to crushing resistance or gape limitation, this simple model was a very poor predictor of prey selection. A more complex model (based on encounter rates and size refuges) successfully explained 46% of the variance in these cases where snails were relatively invulnerable. Finally, we compared estimates of attack probabilities with predictions from optimal foraging theory and found qualitative agreement in that fish ignored prey of low profitabilities and became more selective as the quality of the environment improved. however, the incorporation of variable attack probabilities into the foraging model resolved only a small part of the observed residual variation in selectivities because snails with low profitabilities were already underrepresented in the diet due to their low encounter rates or capture successes. This study demonstrates that predator—prey interactions in size—structured populations can create apparently complex variation in prey selection, but that this variation can be largely understood within a framework that simultaneously considers the dynamics of prey size distributions and how components of the foraging interaction scale with body size of the predator and prey.