Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The interfacial instability between a thiophosphate solid electrolyte and oxide cathodes results in rapid capacity fade and has driven the need for cathode coatings. In this work, the stability, evolution, and performance of uncoated, Li 2 ZrO 3 ‐coated, and Li 3 B 11 O 18 ‐coated LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 cathodes are compared using first‐principles computations and electron microscopy characterization. Li 3 B 11 O 18 is identified as a superior coating that exhibits excellent oxidation/chemical stability, leading to substantially improved performance over cells with Li 2 ZrO 3 ‐coated or uncoated cathodes. The chemical and structural origin of the different performance is interpreted using different microscopy techniques which enable the direct observation of the phase decomposition of the Li 2 ZrO 3 coating. It is observed that Li is already extracted from the Li 2 ZrO 3 in the first charge, leading to the formation of ZrO 2 nanocrystallites with loss of protection of the cathode. After 50 cycles separated (Co, Ni)‐sulfides and Mn‐sulfides can be observed within the Li 2 ZrO 3 ‐coated material. This work illustrates the severity of the interfacial reactions between a thiophosphate electrolyte and oxide cathode and shows the importance of using coating materials that are absolutely stable at high voltage.
Zhang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.