Three ways of engineering the bandgap of graphene, i.e., surface bonding, isoelectronic codoping, and alternating electrical/chemical environment, are analyzed with the effective mass approximation and density-functional theory calculations. Surface bonding on graphene would lift its top σ valence bands above π valence states, open a sp3 gap, but also bury the linearly dispersive bands into the valence σ bands. Isoelectronic codoping and asymmetric electrical or chemical environment may open the π−π∗ gap of graphene by breaking its sublattice equivalence. The calculated effective mass versus bandgap may provide useful guidance for the future experimental efforts to fabricate graphene-based semiconductors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: