Key result
CTA-based radiomic model outperforms clinical and morphometric models in identifying symptomatic patients with AUC ~0.90.
Why the study?
Current surgical eligibility criteria for carotid artery disease are suboptimal, and a comprehensive approach integrating multiple vulnerability biomarkers to detect high-risk carotid plaques is lacking.
Does an integrative machine learning approach combining clinical, radiomic, and morphometric features improve the detection of high-risk carotid plaques in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy?
Observational (n=129)
No
Does an integrative machine learning approach combining clinical, radiomic, and morphometric features improve the detection of high-risk carotid plaques in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.903% vs 0.611%
An integrative machine learning approach combining CTA-based radiomics, clinical data, and morphometric features accurately stratifies symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery disease.
May aid observational carotid plaque stratification; hypothesis-generating and leaves open prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Current surgical eligibility criteria for the treatment of carotid artery disease, primary relying on stenosis and image plaque characteristics, are suboptimal, highlighting the unmet need for improved strategies focused on recognition of high-risk carotid plaques. Despite the suggestion of various vulnerability biomarkers (clinical, biological, image, morphometric and biomechanical) a comprehensive approach integrating multiple markers is lacking. To this aim, this study proposes a novel integrative machine learning approach for the detection of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, based on clinical data, plaque radiomics and morphometric features of the carotid bifurcation. Approach. The study included 129 patients (53 of which symptomatic) who underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) prior to carotid endarterectomy. Following image preprocessing and segmentation, CTA-based radiomic features were extracted and a morphometric analysis of the carotid centerline and bifurcation was performed. Machine learning models were implemented to stratify symptomatic and asymptomatic patients using clinical characteristics, radiomic features and morphometric markers alone and in combination. Moreover, radiomic-clinical, radiomic-morphometric, clinical-morphometric and radiomic-clinical-morphometric models were developed by combining the predicted probabilities of the individual models. Main results. The radiomic model was the strongest standalone predictor (AUC=0.903, balanced accuracy=0.847), significantly outperforming both the clinical and morphometric models (AUC=0.611 and 0.567, balanced accuracy=0.642 and 0.648, respectively). Integrating radiomics with clinical and morphometric features also demonstrated excellent stratification ability (AUC=0.883), with the highest balanced accuracy (=0.884), associated with the correct identification of all the 12 symptomatic patients, and 21 over 27 asymptomatic ones. Significance. This study introduced the first CTA-based approach integrating clinical characteristics, plaque radiomics, and carotid bifurcation morphometric features to predict cerebrovascular events. The findings highlight the value of integrating multiple sources to capture subtle and complementary determinants of cerebrovascular risk, supporting the potential for automated risk stratification and personalized decision-making in patients with carotid artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corti et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Carotid artery disease (n=129). CTA-based radiomic machine learning model vs. Clinical and morphometric models was evaluated on Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for stratifying symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. A CTA-based radiomic model was the strongest standalone predictor for stratifying symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (AUC 0.903), significantly outperforming clinical and morphometric models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: