Tests lexical complexity prediction in Kazakh, indicating morphology improves accuracy.
Graded lexical resources aligned with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and lexical complexity prediction remain limited for low-resource Turkic languages, and the extent to which existing predictive models generalize to agglutinative morphology is unresolved. We introduce the first CEFR-graded lexicon for Kazakh, containing 4561 lemma–part-of-speech (POS) entries across A1–C1, and use it to test whether explicit morphology improves lexical complexity prediction. We compare handcrafted morphological features, XLM-RoBERTa contextual embeddings, and fusion models that combine both signal types on held-out CEFR classification. Our best model, a gated fusion of contextual embeddings with morphological features, achieves a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.360 and a mean absolute error of 1.125 on the held-out test set. Morphology provides useful information beyond character-level cues, contextual representations are strong on their own, and combining them yields the best supervised performance for this task. The paper therefore contributes a new CEFR resource for Turkic languages and evidence that morphology-aware modeling is useful for Kazakh lexical difficulty prediction. The results support Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) by enabling objective assessment of learning-material complexity and adaptive Kazakh language learning. The derived lexicon and code are publicly available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yerkebulan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: