Comparative Mechanical Performance of Alkali-Treated Unidirectional Flax/Epoxy and Hemp/Epoxy Composite Manufactured via VARIM

Fibre-reinforced polymer composites incorporating synthetic reinforcements such as glass and carbon fibres are widely used due to their superior mechanical performance. However, their energy-intensive production and end-of-life disposal contribute to an increased carbon footprint and significant environmental burden. Natural fibre-reinforced composites have emerged as promising low impact alternatives, but variability in their mechanical performance and the lack of controlled comparative studies limit their structural application. This study presents a controlled experimental comparison of alkaline-treated unidirectional flax/epoxy and hemp/epoxy composites fabricated using the vacuum-assisted resin infusion moulding (VARIM) process. Alkali treatment was employed to enhance the fibre–matrix interfacial bonding. Mechanical characterization was conducted through tensile, flexural, impact, interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), and Vickers microhardness testing in accordance with relevant ASTM and ISO standards. The flax/epoxy composites exhibited superior in-plane mechanical performance including, 9.1% higher tensile modulus, 13.8% higher flexural strength and 20.5% higher flexural modulus compared to hemp/epoxy composites. A significant improvement was observed in impact performance, with hemp composites showing 87.4% higher impact strength, indicating enhanced resistance to dynamic loading. Conversely, hemp/epoxy composites demonstrated a 10.6% higher ILSS, suggesting improved interfacial shear resistance and fibre interlocking. These findings confirm that the fibre type significantly influences composite performance, with flax fibres providing superior stiffness and strength, while hemp fibres offer better interlaminar shear behaviour and impact strength. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) fractographic analysis was additionally conducted on fracture surfaces to characterize failure mechanisms and fibre–matrix interfacial morphology. The present study provides a reliable comparative framework for material selection and demonstrates the potential of flax- and hemp-based composites as sustainable alternatives for lightweight structural applications. This study supports the development of sustainable composite materials and contributes to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities).