Key result
Elevated RAP:PCWP ratio linked to ~10.4-fold higher AKI risk during urgent VT ablation.
Why the study?
Risk stratification in patients undergoing urgent VT ablation is limited, especially regarding right ventricular dysfunction, which is often underrecognized.
Does an elevated right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (RAP:PCWP) ratio predict adverse periprocedural outcomes in patients undergoing unplanned ventricular tachycardia ablation?
Cohort (n=102)
No
Does an elevated right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (RAP:PCWP) ratio predict adverse periprocedural outcomes in patients undergoing unplanned ventricular tachycardia ablation?
Invasive assessment of right ventricular dysfunction using a RAP:PCWP ratio > 0.6 strongly predicts acute kidney injury and intraprocedural hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing urgent VT ablation.
RAP:PCWP >0.6 was associated with higher AKI and instability risks in urgent VT ablation; leaves open prospective validation before guiding risk stratification.
Background Risk stratification in patients undergoing urgent ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is limited, particularly regarding right ventricular dysfunction, which is often underrecognized in this setting. Objectives We investigated whether the right atrial pressure (RAP) to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ratio or pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) predicts short‐term outcomes following urgent VT ablation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 102 consecutive patients who underwent unplanned inpatient VT ablation and had right heart catheterization (RHC) within the preceding 12 months. All were admitted with recurrent VT; 67 (66%) had VT storm. Hemodynamic stratification was performed using two established indices of right‐sided function: RAP:PCWP > 0.6 versus ≤ 0.6 and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) < 2 versus ≥ 2, calculated as (pulmonary artery systolic pressure − pulmonary artery diastolic pressure)/right atrial pressure . Outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI), intraprocedural hemodynamic instability, 30‐day VT recurrence, 30‐day mortality/LVAD/transplant, delayed extubation, postoperative length of stay > 7 days, and same‐day complications. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, LVEF, NYHA class, ischemic cardiomyopathy, RHC type, and moderate‐to‐severe MR/TR. Results The cohort was 88% male, mean age 64 ± 11.9 years; 47% had LVEF < 25%, and 58% NYHA III–IV symptoms. RAP:PCWP > 0.6 was independently associated with higher risk of AKI (OR 10.4, 95% CI 2.4–14.1, p = 0.002) and intraprocedural hemodynamic instability (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.5–16.3, p = 0.050). Age > 60 also predicted AKI (OR 12.8, 95% CI 1.3–21.3). PAPi < 2 and LVEF < 25% were not associated with adverse outcomes. Conclusion Among urgent VT ablation patients, elevated RAP:PCWP, but not PAPi, identifies those at increased risk for AKI and intraprocedural hemodynamic instability. Incorporating RAP:PCWP into preprocedural assessment may enhance risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calcagno et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Recurrent ventricular tachycardia undergoing urgent ablation (n=102). RAP:PCWP > 0.6 (Right ventricular dysfunction) vs. RAP:PCWP ≤ 0.6 was evaluated on Acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 10.4, 95% CI 2.4-14.1, p=0.002). An elevated right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (RAP:PCWP > 0.6) was independently associated with significantly higher risks of acute kidney injury (OR 10.4) and intraprocedural hemodynamic instability during urgent VT ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: