Study updates the BOIS protocol by integrating SIMA and BORIS for AI implementation, suggesting improved governance.
AI governance often begins with outputs, risks, and values, but a deeper operational layer is decisive: the machine that defines objects, evidence, agency, risk, closure, and transition. This article updates the BOIS protocol under current BOIS/BORIS v2.6 by adding SIMA as the analytical layer and BORIS as the implementation layer. BOIS is treated as a transition-oriented philosophical machine for organized consequential activity under incomplete knowledge, not as a universal theory or field-validated product. SIMA reconstructs candidate machines from substrate physiology through opers, operome inventories, and operature correspondence. BORIS builds narrow domain implementations that must be tested by experience. The substrate rule M@S remains central: the same abstract machine, run on different relevant substrates, may preserve a high-level function while acquiring different implementation physiologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egor Temnikov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: