Key result
A 6MWT-based treadmill talk test demonstrates excellent reliability for evaluating exercise intensity in CVD.
Why the study?
To validate a treadmill talk test protocol based on the 6-minute walk test predicted average speed to evaluate exercise intensity in adults with CVD.
Is a treadmill talk test protocol based on the 6-minute walk test a valid and reliable method to evaluate exercise intensity in adults with cardiovascular disease?
Observational (n=25)
Is a treadmill talk test protocol based on the 6-minute walk test a valid and reliable method to evaluate exercise intensity in adults with cardiovascular disease?
A treadmill talk test protocol based on the 6-minute walk test is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating and prescribing exercise intensity in patients with cardiovascular disease.
May support 6MWS-based treadmill talk testing for CVD exercise intensity; leaves open confirmation in larger prospective trials.
PURPOSE: To validate a treadmill talk test (TT) protocol based on the 6-minute walk test predicted average speed (6MWS) to evaluate exercise intensity in adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: A cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed on the first day. Two TT were performed on different days. The initial workload (WL) of the proposed TT protocol (treadmill TT protocol based on 6MWS [TT-T6M]) was set at a 2% incline and 70% of the 6MWS. Speed or grade was increased at each subsequent 2-minute stage. Participants recited a paragraph during the final 30 seconds of each stage and were asked if they could speak comfortably. They could respond "yes" (TT+), "uncertain" (TT±), or "no" (TT-). To determine validity, heart rate and WL were collected at ventilatory thresholds (VT) and TT stages, and then correlated using the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient. Test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), with TT stages and total time as variables. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with CVD (15 men, 60 ± 8 years) were included. Test reliability was excellent (ICC2,1 = .86), with no difference in test-retest duration. The heart rate and WL values were similar between VT1 and the last TT+ stage and between VT2 and the TT- stage. Intrarater and interrater agreements for the speech comfort assessment were also excellent (ICC2,1 > .90). CONCLUSIONS: The treadmill TT protocol based on 6MWS is valid, reproducible, and reliable. It can be used to evaluate, prescribe, and monitor the exercise intensity zone, which occurs between the last TT+ and TT- stages, for individuals with CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vieira et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=25). Treadmill talk test protocol based on 6MWS vs. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (ventilatory thresholds) was evaluated on Test reliability (ICC2,1) (ICC 0.86). A treadmill talk test protocol based on the 6-minute walk test showed excellent test reliability (ICC 0.86) and intrarater/interrater agreement (ICC >0.90) for evaluating exercise intensity in CVD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: