Key result
The negative (-/-) stage of the Talk Test estimated the ventilatory threshold with no significant differences in RPE and HR, providing a practical method to gauge exercise intensity in cyclists.
Why the study?
Does the Talk Test accurately estimate the ventilatory threshold in highly trained competitive male cyclists?
Cross-Sectional (n=12)
Does the Talk Test accurately estimate the ventilatory threshold in highly trained competitive male cyclists?
p-value: p=≤0.017
The negative stage of the Talk Test is a practical and accurate method to estimate the ventilatory threshold and gauge exercise intensity in highly trained competitive cyclists.
Talk Test may correspond to ventilatory threshold in trained cyclists; hypothesis-generating for athlete intensity zones, larger trials needed before adoption.
The Talk Test (TT) has been used to determine exercise intensity among various population subgroups but not for competitive athletes. This study was designed to compare the ventilatory threshold (VT) with the last positive (+/+), equivocal (+/-), and negative (-/-) stages of the TT for highly trained cyclists. Twelve men (26.5 ± 4.6 years, 71.9 ± 7.6 kg) consented and completed the study, as approved by the university institutional review board. A maximal graded exercise test was used to identify VT, maximal aerobic capacity ((Equation is included in full-text article.)max: 65.9 ± 6.9 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)), and maximal heart rate (HRmax: 187.3 ± 11.3 b·min). On a separate visit, the TT was administered using the same protocol. Participants were asked if they could speak comfortably after a standard passage recitation. Response options were: "Yes" (+/+), "I'm not sure" (+/-), or "No" (-/-). Variables at VT were compared with the last (+/+), (+/-), and (-/-) stages of TT through t-test with Bonferroni's adjustment (0.05/3). Differences (p ≤ 0.017) were found between variables at VT, as compared with (+/+) TT ((Equation is included in full-text article.): 32.9 ± 7.7 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1), %(Equation is included in full-text article.): 49.9 ± 9.9, heart rate [HR]: 128.7 ± 18.7 b·min, %HRmax: 68.6 ± 7.9, rating of perceived exertion [RPE]: 11.1 ± 1.1) and (+/-) TT ((Equation is included in full-text article.): 44.4 ± 7.5 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1), %(Equation is included in full-text article.): 67.2 ± 7.5). There were no differences between RPE- and HR-based variables at VT, as compared with (+/-) TT (RPE: 13.6 ± 0.63, HR: 147.1 ± 17.2 b·min, %HRmax: 78.5 ± 7.4) or (-/-) TT ((Equation is included in full-text article.): 48.8 ± 7.8 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1), %(Equation is included in full-text article.): 73.9 ± 7.1, HR: 155.6 ± 13.6 b·min, %HRmax: 83.1 ± 5.3, RPE: 14.8 ± 0.90). We found that when the athlete could no longer speak comfortably, he was exercising at or near his VT; we concluded that (-/-) TT estimated VT and can therefore provide a practical method to gauge exercise intensity for highly trained competitive cyclists similar to those in our study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gillespie et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Highly trained competitive male cyclists (n=12). Talk Test (TT) vs. Ventilatory threshold (VT) was evaluated on Physiological variables (VO2, HR, RPE) at VT compared with TT stages (p=≤0.017). The negative (-/-) stage of the Talk Test estimated the ventilatory threshold with no significant differences in RPE and HR, providing a practical method to gauge exercise intensity in cyclists.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: