Identifies physiological factors affecting mean power output in elite rowers, suggesting personalized training approaches.
We aimed to identify the physiological and muscle characteristics associated with mean power output in the final stage of a rowing incremental test in elite rowers. Twenty‐two national level rowers ( n = 9 female) completed the following assessments (i) a 7‐stage incremental rowing ergometer test to determine V̇O 2peak , maximal muscle deoxygenation and final incremental stage mean power output, (ii) strength and power, (iii) lean body mass (LBM) by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, (iv) lower extremity muscle volumes using MR imaging, (v) muscle architecture using diffusion tensor imaging; and (vi) estimated muscle typology via proton MR spectroscopy. Hierarchical multiple linear regression was used to identify the characteristics associated with final incremental stage mean power output with sex and LBM as covariates. Sex explained a substantial proportion of the variance in final incremental stage mean power output ( R 2 = 0.74; adjusted Δ R 2 = 0.72; p < 0.001), while inclusion of LBM further improved model fit ( R 2 = 0.87; Δ R 2 = 0.13; adjusted Δ R 2 = 0.13; p = 0.006). After accounting for sex and LBM, V̇O 2peak demonstrated the largest independent association with final incremental stage mean power output (Δ R 2 = 0.047; adjusted Δ R 2 = 0.047; partial r = 0.60; p = 0.0048), followed by the estimated proportion of type II fibers (Δ R 2 = 0.035; adjusted Δ R 2 = 0.033; partial r = 0.52; p = 0.0188). Most other muscle characteristics explained minimal additional variance. Sex and muscle characteristic interaction terms indicated no detectable sex‐specific differences in this small cohort. These findings highlight the diversity in the underpinning muscle characteristics and may inform personalized interventions targeted at improving rowing performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellinger et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: