Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
General practitioners (GPs) in primary care—particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)—frequently encounter meaningful clinical problems but lack the methodological training to formalize them into research questions. This paper reports a five-stage, AI-assisted approach that embeds established frameworks—including the JBI Population–Concept–Context framework, scoping review methodology, and evidence-based questioning paradigms—into nine standardized AI prompts, guiding GPs through: practice observation and value assessment; information extraction and evidence-based transformation; literature search and knowledge summarization; research question prototype construction; and methodology selection and feasibility assessment. Built on human-AI collaboration with human primacy, the approach requires no prior methodological training. It was piloted through the Shanghai General Practice Research Network (SGPRN) and is most applicable in low evidence-density primary care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: