Why the study?
The impact of aortic arch morphology on procedural management and clinical outcomes in transfemoral TAVR had not been evaluated.
Does an artificial intelligence-derived aortic arch approach index predict procedural complications and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
Does an artificial intelligence-derived aortic arch approach index predict procedural complications and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An artificial intelligence-derived approach index characterizing aortic arch morphology is a strong independent predictor of major periprocedural complications in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR.
BACKGROUND: The impact of aortic arch (AA) morphology on the management of the procedural details and the clinical outcomes of the transfemoral artery (TF)-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not been evaluated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the AA morphology of patients who had TF-TAVR using an artificial intelligence algorithm and then to evaluate its predictive value for clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1480 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVR using a new-generation transcatheter heart valve at 12 institutes were included in this retrospective study. The AA measurements were evaluated by deep learning, and then the approach index (I A ) was determined. The machine learning algorithm was used to construct the predictive model and was validated externally. RESULTS: The area under the curve of the I A model using random forest and logistic regression was 0.675 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.586-0.764] and 0.757 (95% CI: 0.665-0.849), respectively. The I A model was validated externally, and consistent distinctions were obtained. After we used a generalized propensity score matching method for continuous exposure, the I A was the strongest correlation factor for major procedural events (odds ratio: 3.87; 95% CI: 2.13-7.59, P < 0.001). When leaflet morphology or transcatheter heart valve type was an interactive item with I A , neither of them was statistically significant in terms of clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: I A may be used to identify the impact of AA morphology on procedural and clinical outcomes in patients having TF-TAVR and to help to predict the procedural complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: