Critical review outlines network-level seismic resilience strategies for urban infrastructure, suggesting new design paradigms.
Near-fault ground motions (NFGMs), characterized by forward-directivity velocity pulses, impose severe kinematic demands that challenge conventional structural systems. As modern civil engineering pivots toward rapid functional recovery, a critical paradigm shift is required: moving from component-centric kinematic vulnerability diagnostics to network-level systemic resilience optimization. This comprehensive review elucidates this transition, conceptualizing an integrated “3C Resilience Framework”—encompassing Coupled-multi-hazard, City-scale, and Carbon-friendly dimensions—as a strategic roadmap for next-generation seismic design. A pivotal focus is the physical evaluation of contemporary regulatory evolutions, specifically the multi-point spectral lower-bound constraints in American Society of Civil Engineers Standard 7-22 (ASCE 7-22) and the site-specific scaling factors in Eurocode 8. We demonstrate that these spectral floors are physically essential for flexible and isolated structures to constrain long-period kinetic energy, thereby mitigating the underestimation of residual drifts that fundamentally dictate repairability. Furthermore, this review explicitly aligns structural performance with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 9 & 11). By synthesizing advanced mitigation topologies with surrogate-assisted computational paradigms, this roadmap bridges the micro-to-macro scale gap between physical structural degradation and regional functional restoration, providing an actionable blueprint for sustainable urban networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: