Why the study?
How should patients on antithrombotic agents be managed when undergoing emergency or elective GI endoscopy?
Systematic Review
How should patients on antithrombotic agents be managed when undergoing emergency or elective GI endoscopy?
Provides joint APAGE-APSDE practice guidelines for managing antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing GI endoscopy in the Asian Pacific region.
Supports tailored antithrombotic strategies in Asia-Pacific GI endoscopy; extends global guidelines with regional Delphi consensus.
This Guideline is a joint official statement of the Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE) and the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE). It was developed in response to the increasing use of antithrombotic agents (antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants) in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy in Asia. After reviewing current practice guidelines in Europe and the USA, the joint committee identified unmet needs, noticed inconsistencies, raised doubts about certain recommendations and recognised significant discrepancies in clinical practice between different regions. We developed this joint official statement based on a systematic review of the literature, critical appraisal of existing guidelines and expert consensus using a two-stage modified Delphi process. This joint APAGE-APSDE Practice Guideline is intended to be an educational tool that assists clinicians in improving care for patients on antithrombotics who require emergency or elective GI endoscopy in the Asian Pacific region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review in Patients on antithrombotic agents undergoing emergency or elective gastrointestinal endoscopy. Management strategies for antithrombotic agents (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) was evaluated. The APAGE-APSDE guidelines provide regional recommendations for periprocedural antithrombotic management, including early resumption of aspirin and DOACs post-hemostasis and tailored bridging strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: