Key result
Low dose fibrinolysis infusion was associated with lower rates of ischaemic stroke (0% vs. 30.7%) and minor bleeding (12.5% vs. 25.1%) compared to conventional dose.
Why the study?
Many patients with prosthetic valve thrombosis present with an INR in the therapeutic range, surgery may not be feasible, and a high INR has traditionally been viewed as a relative contraindication to fibrinolysis.
Does fibrinolysis improve outcomes and is it safe in patients with left-sided obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis and high INR at presentation?
Observational (n=30)
Does fibrinolysis improve outcomes and is it safe in patients with left-sided obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis and high INR at presentation?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 30.7%
In patients with left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis and high INR, fibrinolysis using a low dose infusion appears feasible and is associated with lower risks of bleeding and ischaemic stroke compared to conventional dosing.
May support low-dose fibrinolysis in high-INR prosthetic valve thrombosis; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: A significant number of patients with prosthetic valve thrombosis have a prothrombin time international normalised ratio in the therapeutic range at presentation. Surgery may not be possible in many patients and traditionally a high international normalised ratio is considered a relative contraindication for fibrinolysis. METHODS: We conducted an observational study in patients with left-sided obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis with international normalised ratio at or above the therapeutic range at presentation who received fibrinolysis. The fibrinolytic regimens, timing of initiation, success of fibrinolysis, risk of major and minor bleeding and ischaemic stroke were evaluated in the study. RESULTS: Of 30 patients included in the study 70% received immediate fibrinolysis and in 30% it was delayed. The majority of patients (90%) presented with New York Heart Association class III/IV symptoms. The mean international normalised ratio at fibrinolysis was 3.04 ± 0.70 in the immediate group and 2.42 ± 0.89 in the delayed group. Haemodynamically stable patients who had delayed initiation of fibrinolysis had a trend towards less bleeding without an increase in mortality. The rates of intracranial haemorrhage (0% vs. 7.7%), minor bleeding (12.5% vs. 25.1%) and ischaemic stroke (0% vs. 30.7%) were lower in patients who received low dose infusion compared to a conventional dose. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrinolysis can be considered in patients with prosthetic valve thrombosis with high international normalised ratio at presentation. For haemodynamically stable patients, delayed initiation of fibrinolysis is associated with a marginally lower bleeding risk without an increase in mortality. Low dose infusion may be considered over a conventional dose as it is associated with a lower incidence of ischaemic stroke and a good rate of valve function restoration with a trend towards less bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishanth et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Left-sided obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis with high INR (n=30). Low dose fibrinolysis infusion vs. Conventional dose fibrinolysis was evaluated on Ischaemic stroke. Low dose fibrinolysis infusion was associated with lower rates of ischaemic stroke (0% vs. 30.7%) and minor bleeding (12.5% vs. 25.1%) compared to conventional dose.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: