Review analyzes radiation damage mechanisms in perovskites, indicating the need for improved stability assessments and design principles.
Metal halide perovskites show great promise as candidates for next-generation high-energy radiation detection, competing with traditional scintillators and semiconductors owing to their high sensitivity and defect tolerance. However, the deployment of robust detectors is currently impeded by inconsistent stability assessments and a lack of rational design principles for radiation hardening. This review addresses these challenges by examining the radiation damage mechanisms specific to various sources, decoupling the complex interplay between ionization-induced self-healing and displacement damage accumulation within the unique soft lattice. We analyze how compositional engineering and dimensionality reduction can effectively suppress defect propagation. Crucially, we identify that long-term reliability is often limited by extrinsic device interfaces rather than the intrinsic perovskite bulk. Furthermore, we highlight the limitations of generic laboratory radiation sources and propose a transition toward application-specific evaluation protocols that distinguish between transient artifacts and intrinsic material degradation. This review aims to provide theoretical guidance and references for designing the next generation of highly radiation-stable perovskite materials and devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: