Literature-based conceptual paper argues against ‘no-touch’ policies in early childhood education, suggesting implications for child development.
Touch is a key element of social interactions within early childhood and forms part of a relational pedagogy. Children naturally use touch daily and research demonstrates that it is a vital component of child development. Effective educators use touch sensitively and appropriately to support children from hand-holding for safety, to high-fives for praise. However, using touch is not without challenges and in recent years there has been a resurgence of ‘no-touch’ policies in schools and settings. Through the lenses of current literature and research alongside attachment and traditional theory, this literature-based conceptual paper seeks to demonstrate how these policies go against current research and offers an evidence-informed argument to counter them. Arguing that educators have a duty of care acting in loco-parentis, incorporating sensitive and appropriate touch between educators and children in schools and settings strengthens social and emotional bonds, enhances learning and is vital within childhood and essential for human survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamsin Grimmer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: