Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantifies cooling energy demand in urban buildings, indicating implications for efficient design.
Urban morphology greatly influences cooling energy demand in buildings. However, limited understanding and quantification of compactness-related factors such as inter-building shading and solar exposure undermine the accurate prediction of cooling energy demand. This study presents a comprehensive multi-scale framework that integrates geometric, spatial-statistical, fractal, and point-pattern measures to capture urban building compactness and its relationship with cooling energy demand. Central to this framework is the Urban Building Shadow Exposure Metric (UB-SEM), a novel, climate-responsive indicator that quantifies cumulative inter-building shading using sun-path dynamics, building geometry and inter-building spacing. Applied across India’s five climatic zones, UB-SEM demonstrates moderate to strong associations with Cooling Energy Use Intensity (EUI), revealing the influence of climate, sun-path, and building geometries. UB-SEM is further evaluated as a surrogate for surrounding-building effects in Urban Building Energy Modelling (UBEM). When used to approximate radiative interactions, UB-SEM-adjusted Cooling EUI shows high agreement with full-context energy simulations with surrounding buildings’ effects, yielding r = 0.88, R² = 0.78, and a low percentage RMSE of 8.33%. These results demonstrate that inter-building effects can be captured efficiently using a shadow-based compactness indicator like UB-SEM through a simplified formulation. This substantially reduces the need for computationally intensive radiative modelling in many UBEM applications focused on cooling energy demand. The study provides a scalable, transferable, and computationally efficient framework for urban building compactness-energy analysis. By incorporating climate-aware shadow dynamics into compactness assessment, UB-SEM supports efficient UBEM workflows and offers a robust foundation for evidence-based urban design across diverse climatic contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: