Reveals distinct drought adaptation strategies in strawberry cultivars, suggesting pathways for breeding resilient varieties.
FW under PEG at peak stress). Transcriptomic profiling (18 RNA-Seq libraries, ~ 872 million reads) revealed fundamentally different stress strategies. E22 showed extensive transcriptome reprogramming, with 22,558 differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) under PEG, including down-regulation of photosynthesis-related pathways and up-regulation of ABA signaling, MAPK cascades, and heat shock response. In contrast, Kara exhibited a restrained response (< 900 DETs per stress condition), with differential expression focused on homeostasis-related functions such as transcription regulation, protein folding, and RNA processing. PEG-induced osmotic stress consistently elicited a stronger transcriptomic response than progressive water deficit in both cultivars, suggesting that osmotic sensing is a primary driver of large-scale gene regulation under drought. Enrichment analyses (GO/KEGG via ORA and GSEA) confirmed that E22 activated canonical drought and heat stress pathways, while Kara selectively engaged transcriptional regulators and RNA-processing genes. Transcription factor profiling showed extensive activation of AP2/ERF, NAC, WRKY, and MYB families in E22, with far fewer TFs altered in Kara. qRT-PCR validation of selected DEGs corroborated the RNA-Seq findings. These results provide new insights into cultivar-specific drought adaptation and identify candidate genes for breeding stress-resilient strawberry varieties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Topçu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: