Randomized trial evaluates predictive accuracy of physics-informed models in concrete strength assessment, suggesting improved reliability.
Prediction of concrete compressive strength using Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) is critical for structural health assessment, but conventional data-driven models often lack physical plausibility and can exhibit degraded performance when extrapolating beyond the training domain. This study introduces and systematically evaluates a hybrid modeling framework belonging to the broader family of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), where established concrete maturity models are enforced architecturally. The PINN architecture utilizes a neural network to infer the physical parameters of maturity models from NDT inputs (Electrical Resistivity and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity), with the final strength prediction governed by the embedded physical equation. A standard Neural Network (standard NN), optimized via a systematic hyperparameter search, and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) were compared against four PINN variants, each incorporating a different maturity function (Exponential, ACI 209R, FIB Model Code, and Richards). Results from a 5-fold cross-validation procedure demonstrate that while the unconstrained standard NN achieved the highest accuracy in interpolation (R 2 =0.981), its performance was closely trailed by the PINN variants. In the challenging extrapolation task on unseen late-age data, the PINN-FIB model yielded superior performance (R 2 =0.836), demonstrating robust generalization. In contrast, the purely data-driven standard NN failed to generalize (R 2 =-0.071), yielding predictive accuracy inferior to a mean-baseline model, while the MLR model achieved limited generalization (R 2 =0.336). The PINN framework also provides an explainable gray-box mapping from NDT measurements to parameters such as ultimate strength and hydration rate, delivering wider, albeit under-calibrated, predictive uncertainty bounds compared to the standard NN. The findings conclude that enforcing appropriate physical constraints is essential for reliable and transparent predictive models suitable for engineering applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalid Saqer Alotaibi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: