Abstract Access to affordable housing remains a pressing global challenge. In South Africa, social housing is a strategic policy instrument designed to provide affordable rental housing and restructure apartheid-era spatial inequalities. Its delivery, however, is shaped by a complex institutional framework. This study examines the systemic barriers that Social Housing Landlords face in navigating the Consolidated Capital Grant process. Drawing on conceptual frameworks of spatial justice and institutional capability, the article investigates the operational constraints that hinder South Africa’s Social Housing Programme’s transformative intent. An exploratory qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews with ten participants (five emerging Social Housing Landlords and five sector experts). Data were analysed thematically to identify common institutional and procedural constraints. Findings reveal that protracted administrative delays, sequential approval processes, and circular dependencies between grant and debt financing create significant implementation bottlenecks. Municipal capacity constraints and an ‘open-door’ policy that disperses scarce resources further undermine project viability. These barriers are analysed as symptoms of deeper systemic misalignments between decommodification goals and market-driven delivery systems, compounded by deficits in Social Housing Landlords’ operational capabilities. The study concludes that a more streamlined, accountable, and collaborative institutional ecosystem is required. This necessitates a strategic shift from quantitative outputs to building institutional resilience, supported by parallel approval mechanisms, structured capacity-building pathways, and formalised partnerships to enhance the sector’s long-term impact and its contribution to spatial justice.
Mokonyama et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: