Commentary argues for integrating lived experience into child welfare policy to improve outcomes for families affected by substance use.
Parental substance use is a central driver of child welfare system involvement in the United States, yet child welfare policy often operates in tension with recovery-oriented approaches to substance use. This commentary argues that integrating lived experience into child welfare policymaking is both an ethical imperative and a pragmatic strategy for improving policy alignment, implementation, and outcomes. Drawing on the growing role of peer recovery specialists working with child welfare-involved parents, this paper examines how lived experience functions as policy-relevant knowledge that surfaces conflicts between externally motivated compliance frameworks and internally motivated recovery processes. The commentary concludes by outlining policy levers to institutionalize lived experience at the policy table, preserving recovery-oriented values and promoting family stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: