Key result
Older age, lower education, and higher stent burden linked to lower self-esteem post-PCI.
Why the study?
Percutaneous coronary intervention is widely used for CHD, but self-esteem levels and key factors influencing self-esteem among CHD patients following PCI needed characterization.
What are the levels of and factors influencing self-esteem in patients with coronary heart disease following percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cross-Sectional (n=316)
No
What are the levels of and factors influencing self-esteem in patients with coronary heart disease following percutaneous coronary intervention?
CHD patients post-PCI exhibit self-esteem levels in the lower range of general population norms, which are independently influenced by age, education, income, residence, CHD duration, and number of stents.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a widely used therapeutic modality for coronary heart disease (CHD). This study aimed to characterize self-esteem levels and identify key factors influencing self-esteem among CHD patients following PCI. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among CHD patients undergoing PCI at our hospital between February 2024 and January 2025. Self-esteem was assessed using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), a 10-item 4-point Likert scale with a total score range of 10–40 points (higher scores indicate greater self-worth). Clinical trial number: Not applicable. A total of 316 CHD patients were included. The study sample had a mean age of 62.3 ± 8.5 years, with 30.4% being female. The overall mean RSES score was 23.18 ± 3.05. Correlation analysis revealed significant associations between self-esteem and age ( r = -0.610), educational level ( r = 0.602), per capita monthly household income ( r = 0.628), place of residence ( r = 0.534), duration of CHD diagnosis ( r = 0.614), and number of stents implanted ( r = -0.631). Multiple linear regression confirmed these as independent factors: age (β = -0.142, 95% CI: -0.215 to -0.069), educational level (β = 0.876, 95% CI: 0.321 to 1.431), per capita monthly household income (β = 0.563, 95% CI: 0.189 to 0.937), place of residence (β = 1.245, 95% CI: 0.152 to 2.338), duration of CHD diagnosis (β = 0.987, 95% CI: 0.526 to 1.448), and number of stents implanted (β = -0.320, 95% CI: -0.451 to -0.189). Variance inflation factor (VIF) values ranged from 1.32 to 2.45 (no significant multicollinearity). CHD patients post-PCI exhibit self-esteem levels within the lower range of general population norms, with several factors independently influencing these scores. These findings highlight the need for targeted psychological interventions tailored to vulnerable subgroups to enhance post-PCI psychological well-being and optimize recovery outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary Heart Disease post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (n=316). Age was evaluated on Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) score (association with age) (β = -0.142, 95% CI -0.215 to -0.069, p=0.018). In patients with coronary heart disease post-percutaneous coronary intervention, older age was independently associated with lower self-esteem (β = -0.142), alongside lower education and a higher number of implanted stents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: