This article advances a justice-centered framework to enhance sustainable energy transitions by ensuring fairness in allocation, suggesting improved legitimacy and compliance.
Energy transition is often framed as a problem of cost; it is, more fundamentally, a problem of allocation and institutional design under real resource constraints. Decarbonization advances while deprivation persists, revealing a structural tension between ecological ambition and distributive order. Such imbalance erodes legitimacy, weakens compliance, and destabilizes reform. This article advances a justice-centered framework in which sustainability endures only when fairness disciplines allocation, secures credibility, and anchors the institutional conditions for durable transition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olatunji A. Shobande (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: