Key result
Turkish Perceived Workplace Support Scale demonstrates adequate structural validity but fair test-retest reliability.
Why the study?
The study aimed to adapt the Perceived Workplace Support Scale into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties among individuals with inflammatory arthritis.
Cross-Sectional (n=200)
The Turkish version of the PWSS demonstrates adequate structural validity and internal consistency, but fair test-retest reliability, making it suitable primarily for group-level analyses in individuals with inflammatory arthritis.
Validated Turkish PWSS supports workplace research in IA; leaves open clinical adoption and outcome trials.
Objective This study aimed to adapt the Perceived Workplace Support Scale (PWSS) into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties among individuals diagnosed with Inflammatory Arthritis (IA). Methods A total of 200 employed individuals with IA (mean age = 37.9 ± 10.6 years; 66.5% female) participated in the study. The cultural adaptation followed Beaton’s method, including forward translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, and cognitive debriefing. Construct validity was assessed using Rasch analysis. Internal consistency was examined with Cronbach’s alpha, and test-retest reliability was evaluated in a subsample using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Concurrent validity was examined by correlating PWSS dimension scores with the Work Limitation Questionnaire-Short Form (WLQ-SF), Rheumatoid Arthritis Work Instability Scale (RA-WIS), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health (WPAI: GH). Results Rasch analysis supported the structural validity of the Turkish PWSS, showing adequate model fit after addressing local item dependencies. Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.59 (manager) to 0.81 (coworker). Test–retest reliability indicated fair stability, with ICCs of 0.47 (manager), 0.52 (coworker), and 0.59 (organization). These findings suggest that the scale is more appropriate for group-level comparisons rather than individual-level assessment. The scores for PWSS subdimensions showed moderate correlations with work and health measures, supporting concurrent validity. Conclusions The Turkish version of the PWSS demonstrates potential utility for assessing perceived workplace support in individuals with IA. However, given the fair level of test–retest reliability, it should be used with caution and primarily for group-level analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bumın et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Inflammatory Arthritis (n=200). Perceived Workplace Support Scale (PWSS) was evaluated on Psychometric properties including structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. The Turkish Perceived Workplace Support Scale showed adequate structural validity and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.59-0.81) but fair test-retest reliability (ICC 0.47-0.59).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: