Evaluates queen bee status detection using acoustic monitoring across diverse apiaries, indicating enhanced accuracy.
Honeybees are indispensable pollinators for agricultural ecosystems, and a colony’s stability and reproductive capacity depend critically on the presence of a healthy queen. Acoustic monitoring has emerged as a promising non-invasive, lighting-independent approach for long-term colony observation. However, existing studies have largely been confined to single-apiary datasets or merged datasets from multiple similar apiaries for model training. Moreover, model evaluation has relied primarily on overall performance metrics, with insufficient attention to cross-region generalization and the detection of queen loss, a rare but critical condition. This study systematically investigates three complementary strategies: noise-augmented data diversification, lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture optimization via comprehensive ablation experiments, and transfer learning with fine-tuning to bridge the domain gap between source and target apiaries. Under cross-apiary evaluation, the proposed approach achieves an accuracy of 92.79%, a negative-class F1-score of 0.7900, and a negative-class recall of 0.7834 when only limited target-domain training samples are available. With full target-domain training data, the same strategy further attains an accuracy of 95.05%, a negative-class F1-score of 0.8596, and a negative-class recall of 0.8733. t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) visualization demonstrates that noise augmentation effectively expands sample diversity in the feature space, while Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) heatmaps confirm the successful transfer of source-domain acoustic features to the target domain. This work provides a practical approach for deploying acoustic-based queen status monitoring across diverse apiaries with minimal local data collection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: