Randomized trial analyzes viral blips and their impact on virologic rebound in adults with untreated HIV-1, suggesting clinical implications for treatment.
Background We present a post hoc analysis of viral blips (HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL between 2 values of <50 copies/mL) in the DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD doravirine (DOR) Phase 3 studies. Methods Adults living with untreated HIV-1 were randomized (1:1) to a DOR-containing regimen or comparator (darunavir/ritonavir- or efavirenz-containing), each with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, for 96 weeks (double-blind base), followed by 96 weeks of a DOR-containing regimen (open-label extension). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze relationships between frequency of blips, baseline characteristics, and virologic rebound (2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL). Results In the base studies, blips occurred in 11.1%–11.9% of participants who received DOR and 12.1%–15.4% who received comparator. In the extensions, blips occurred in 5.5%–7.9% of participants. Baseline HIV-1 RNA ≤100 000 copies/mL was associated with lower likelihood of blips in the base studies (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; [95% CI, 0.29–0.58]) and in participants who continued DOR in the extensions (0.41 [0.19–0.87]). Baseline CD4+ T-cell count ≤200 cells/mm3 was associated with increased likelihood of blips in participants who switched to DOR (3.47 [1.43–8.43]). Virologic rebound occurred in 7.0% of participants in the base studies and 3.8% in the extensions. Virologic rebound was more common in participants with blips versus no blips in the base studies (13.6% vs 6.1%; 3.79 [2.32–6.18]). Conclusions Blips were associated with increased risk of virologic rebound during the base study, and blips were less likely in participants with lower baseline HIV-1 RNA. Doravirine and comparator groups had similar rates of viral blips. Clinical Trials Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02275780, NCT02403674
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: