Randomized trial examines motivational pathways and leadership impact on sustainable behavior in employees, suggesting strategic alignment for effectiveness.
This study examines how organizational pro-environmental values are associated with employee sustainable behavior through differentiated motivational pathways and under what leadership conditions these associations are strengthened. Drawing on self-determination theory, we propose that autonomous and controlled motivation serve as distinct mediating mechanisms, while green transformational leadership facilitates the internalization of organizational pro-environmental values into autonomous motivation. A two-study design was adopted. Study 1, based on individual-level survey data from 158 employees in tourism enterprises, showed that employee-rated organizational pro-environmental values were positively associated with both high-level and general-level sustainable behavior through different pathways: autonomous motivation mediated the relationship with high-level sustainable behavior, whereas controlled motivation mediated the relationship with general-level sustainable behavior. Study 2, a scenario-based experiment with 234 participants with tourism-related work experience, showed that green transformational leadership strengthened the effect of organizational pro-environmental values on autonomous motivation and amplified the corresponding indirect effect on high-level sustainable behavior intention. Supplementary analyses further indicated that this moderating role did not equivalently extend to the controlled-motivation pathway toward general-level intention. These findings advance research on employee sustainable behavior by distinguishing behavioral levels, motivational mechanisms, and leadership-based boundary conditions. Practically, the study suggests that organizations should embed pro-environmental values, align motivational strategies with behavioral goals, and develop green transformational leadership.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: