Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study evaluates visual improvement after lensectomy and IOL implantation in children, indicating surgical success.
Background Ectopia lentis in the pediatric population poses significant surgical challenges given the need for long-term optical rehabilitation. This study evaluated the feasibility and clinical outcomes of lensectomy combined with scleral-sutured intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in pediatric patients with genetic ectopia lentis.Methods We conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients with atraumatic (sub)luxation of the crystalline lens who underwent lensectomy, anterior vitrectomy, and scleral-fixated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) IOL implantation in the sulcus. Outcome measures included best-corrected distance and near visual acuities (LogMAR), refractive outcomes and complication rates. Mean follow-up duration was 6.5 ± 2.9 years (range: 1.7-11.5 years).Results Nineteen children (36 eyes; 55% male; mean age 5.1 ± 1.9 years) were included. BCVA improved significantly for near vision (0.72 ± 0.3 to 0.19 ± 0.3; p < 0.001) and distance vision (0.48 ± 0.2 to 0.05 ± 0.2; p = 0.008). The spherical equivalent shifted from - 6.3 ± 4.6 D preoperatively to + 1.5 ± 1.4 D at one month, then to - 0.7 ± 2.6 D at final follow-up, reflecting a mean myopic shift of - 2.26 ± 2.11 D. Vision-threatening IOL subluxation occurred in 5 eyes (14% of eyes; 21% of patients). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated its cumulative incidence at 7% at 5 years and 16% at 10 years.Conclusions Lensectomy combined with scleral-fixated sulcus PMMA IOL implantation is a viable surgical strategy for pediatric ectopia lentis, yielding substantial visual improvement and acceptable refractive outcomes. IOL subluxation remains the primary long-term concern, underscoring the need for sustained postoperative surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vallotton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: