Background: Massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) is associated with high early mortality due to acute right ventricular failure, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly used as a rescue strategy to stabilize hemodynamics and gas exchange while definitive reperfusion therapies are performed. However, evidence regarding outcomes remains limited and heterogeneous. Methods: We conducted a focused systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective single-center studies reporting outcomes of adult patients with MPE treated with ECMO. Three eligible studies were included (Lin et al., 2021; Moon et al., 2018; George et al., 2022). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Pooled mortality was estimated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Results: A total of 37 patients with massive pulmonary embolism supported with ECMO were analyzed. The crude in-hospital mortality was 37.8% (14/37). Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled in-hospital mortality of 36.3% (95% CI 10.0–62.6%), with substantial heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 69.8%). Individual study mortality ranged from 15.4% to 57.1%. Most patients experienced cardiac arrest, refractory shock, or severe hemodynamic collapse prior to ECMO initiation. ECMO was mainly used as a salvage or bridging therapy to reperfusion strategies, including thrombolysis and surgical or catheter-based embolectomy. Conclusion: In patients with MPE complicated by circulatory collapse, ECMO is associated with survival in approximately two-thirds of cases, despite significant heterogeneity. ECMO may provide life-saving stabilization in otherwise fatal MPE, but further prospective multicenter studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfarizki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: