Retrospective study characterizes cefiderocol outcomes in hematologic patients, suggesting emerging resistance issues.
OBJECTIVES: Given the limited real-world evidence in immunocompromised patients, we aimed to characterize cefiderocol use and outcomes in haematological patients. METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter study including consecutive haematological malignancy patients treated with cefiderocol (July 2022-March 2025) at two tertiary-level hospitals in Spain and Italy. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received cefiderocol; median age was 65.4 years, 50% male. Prior broad-spectrum antibiotics exposure occurred in 85.7% (24/28), and 57.1% (16/28) were colonized with multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. Cefiderocol was administered empirically in 53.5% (15/28) and as targeted therapy in 46.4% (13/28). Microbiological documentation obtained in 85.7% (24/28), with MDR pathogens in 75% (18/24). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was most frequent (13/28; 46.4%). Cefiderocol resistance occurred in 30.0% (3/10) of empirically gram-negative (GN) infections, and in 42.9% (3/7) of MDR-GNB cases, despite no prior exposure. One patient with necrotic skin P. aeruginosa infection developed resistance, with minimum inhibitory concentration increasing from 2 µg/mL to 64 µg/mL during follow-up. Two patients with MDR infections were clinically cured; however, new colonizations with cefiderocol-resistant P. aeruginosa and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM)-producing K. pneumoniae developed during treatment. Overall 30-day mortality was 35.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol showed clinical response and no safety signal were identified in hematologic malignancy patients with MDR infections. However, emerging resistance requires research to optimize its role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez-Urrea et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: