Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 12, 2026Open Access

A Comparative Analysis of Sustainability Reporting Frameworks

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LPLiana Paraschiv

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Qualitative analysis evaluates sustainability frameworks, highlighting diverse stakeholder needs and materiality concepts.

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze various sustainability reporting frameworks and their implications for stakeholders.
  • Qualitative comparative approach
  • Evaluation of frameworks based on six criteria: purpose, scope, materiality, standardization, regulatory status, comparability
  • Focus on frameworks including CDP, GRI, SDGs, SASB Standards, ESRS
  • Identification of multiple frameworks coexisting to meet diverse stakeholder needs
  • Variations in conceptualizations of materiality across frameworks
  • Differences in comparability and consistency of sustainability information disclosed

Cite This Study

Liana Paraschiv (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2ba3fa8101cf8926f02732https://doi.org/10.24818/rmci.2026.2.267
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evolution of Sustainability Reporting Frameworks2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Measuring and Reporting ESG: A Systematic Review of Frameworks for Financial Sustainability2026 · 5 citations
  3. 3Standards on Corporate and Public Sustainability Reporting2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Comparative Analysis between Companies that Adopt GRI Standards and Those that Follow only IFRS (ISSB) - Sustainability Report2025 · 2 citations
  5. 5GRI Standards for Environmental Sustainability – A Brief Review2024 · 1 citations