PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 2026Radiology Research and Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Multicenter Study Suggests Unsupervised Learning Derived From MRI Identifies Prognostic Subgroups in Prostate Cancer Patients After Prostatectomy

View Full Paper
GHGuoqing HuXLXiaofeng LiuXLXiaofeng Liu

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify prognostic subgroups of prostate cancer patients after surgery based on MRI and clinical data.
  • Analyzed preoperative MRI and clinical data from 400 patients.
  • Used LASSO-Cox analysis to select relevant features and K-means clustering for subgroup identification.
  • Compared predictive performance of the new model against established risk assessment models using the concordance index.
  • Identified three distinct prognostic subgroups within the Radiomic-Clinical model.
  • Demonstrated superior predictive accuracy with C-indices of 0.82, 0.78, and 0.79, outpacing the EAU, CAPRA, and PIPEN models (p < 0.05).

Abstract

Objective To identify subgroups of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features and evaluate the prognostic value in predicting 5‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Materials Preoperative MRI and clinical data from 400 patients (185 with recurrence) were collected from three centers (one training and two external validation groups). Radiomics features were extracted from index lesions. PFS‐associated clinical and radiomics features were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)‐Cox analysis. The K‐means clustering method was used to identify subgroups and construct a Radiomic‐Clinical model. PFS differences across subgroups were assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. The predictive performance of the Radiomic‐Clinical model was compared with the European Association of Urology (EAU), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA), and PIPEN models using the concordance index (C‐index). Results A total of 5 clinical and 13 radiomics features were selected, and three distinct prognostic subgroups were identified within the Radiomic‐Clinical model. The Radiomic‐Clinical model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy with C‐indices of 0.82 (training group), 0.78 (validation group 1), and 0.79 (validation group 2), outperforming the EAU (0.68, 0.70, and 0.65), CAPRA (0.71, 0.67, and 0.70), and PIPEN models (0.71, 0.70, and 0.68) ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Unsupervised learning using radiomics and clinical data effectively identifies distinct prognostic subgroups in PCa patients after RP, offering superior predictive performance over existing models for 5‐year PFS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2ba3fa8101cf8926f027f9https://doi.org/10.1155/rrp/6424056
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper