Proof-of-concept case demonstrates lower deviations with hybrid workflow in full-arch rehabilitation, suggesting potential benefits.
Background/Objectives: Digital workflows have significantly improved implant prosthodontic procedures; however, full-arch and complex rehabilitations still present challenges for intraoral scanning because of cumulative stitching errors, limited anatomical landmarks, and reduced scan body stability. Methods: This article describes a single proof-of-concept clinical case in which a hybrid Scan Transfer workflow was applied to support implant position transfer during intraoral scanning through stabilization, verification, and supplementary extraoral acquisition steps. The proposed workflow was compared descriptively with a conventional scan body approach in one full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation. Digital datasets were acquired with an intraoral scanner and analyzed by curve-based superimposition to explore relative discrepancies between the two transfer methods. Results: In this individual case, the hybrid workflow showed descriptive findings suggestive of lower deviations, particularly in posterior regions, and favorable framework adaptation on the reference model. Conclusions: Because the evidence is limited to a single clinical case and no inferential statistical analysis was performed, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating only. Further controlled in vitro and clinical studies with larger samples are required before conclusions can be drawn regarding accuracy, reliability, or clinical superiority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scrascia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: