This analysis uncovers how acceleration and platform logic affect journal identity and equity in scholarly communication.
Key Points Acceleration in life sciences reconfigures journals from curated voices to speed‐optimized, metric‐driven portals, dissolves journal identity, and renders them Augé's ‘non‐places’. Legacy publishers and digital natives converge on speed guarantees and dashboards, prioritizing efficiency over identity. Rising APCs, uneven peer‐review capacity, and shrinking citation half‐lives underscore growing inequities in scholarly communication. Sustaining cumulative, trustworthy science demands governance: integrity audits, transparent cost models, and depth‐focused evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colangelo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: