Latent profile analysis examines AI literacy's impact on evidence-based practice competence in nurses, highlighting key implications.
To understand the current state of nurses’ artificial intelligence (AI) literacy. This study employs latent profile analysis to examine the relationship between different profile categories of AI literacy and evidence-based practice competence (EBPC) among nurses. From January to February 2026, nurses from Qingbaijiang District in Sichuan Province were selected by a self-designed general information questionnaire, the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale and the Questionnaire to Evaluate the Competency in Evidence-Based Practice of Registered Nurses. Latent profile analysis was performed to explore the profile categories of nurses’ AI literacy, the single-factor analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were employed to investigate the relevant influencing factors. The AI literacy of nurses could be divided into three categories: the low AI literacy group (48.8%), the moderate AI literacy group (37.1%) and the high AI literacy group (14.1%). AI training and EBPC were the influencing factors of different profile categories ( P < 0.001). These profile categories had significant effects on the nurses’ EBPC, as well as its four dimensions: attitude, knowledge, skill and application. Nursing administrators should effectively identify nurses with low AI literacy and develop personalized intervention plans to promote the development of AI literacy and EBPC. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: