Randomized trial compares conservative and liberal fluid administration for children after kidney transplant, suggesting optimal practices for recovery.
Introduction In current practice, fluid volumes administered to children following kidney transplant vary widely. Up to 52% of children experience fluid overload-related complications. Current fluid guidelines are not evidence-based and the optimal amount of fluid for children after transplant is not known. The aim of Randomised multiple centre trial of conservative versus LIberal fluid adMInisTration for children receiving a kidney tranSplant (LIMITS) is to determine whether relative limitation of fluid volume administered to children receiving kidney transplants is superior to liberal fluid volume administration. Methods and analysis LIMITS is a pragmatic, open-label, UK-based, multicentre randomised controlled trial, with an internal pilot phase and integrated economic evaluation. A total of 140 children receiving kidney transplants will be randomised to receive either conservative postoperative fluid administration (maximum of 150 mL/m 2 /hour for no longer than 18 hours, followed by a fixed daily target of maximum 1.5 L/m 2 /day thereafter) versus the comparator of liberal postoperative fluid administration (fluid volume administered to replace urine output and insensible losses for at least 48 hours with target urine output >2 mL/kg/hour). The primary outcome is mean days at home in the first 30 days after kidney transplant. The primary outcome will be analysed using a mixed linear regression model adjusted for donor type (living vs deceased donor) and participant weight (<20 kg and ≥20 kg pretransplant) as fixed effects and transplant centre as a random effect. Cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated. Ethics and dissemination The trial received Health Research Authority approval on 20 August 2025 (REC reference: 25/EE/0161, IRAS project ID: 354370). Findings will be presented to academic groups via national and international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. The patient and public involvement group will play an important part in disseminating the study findings to the public domain. Trial registration number ISRCTN21516608 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calder et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: