Cross-sectional analysis observes neutrophil dysfunction linked to vasculopathy in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients, indicating immune imbalance.
Background: Neutrophils play a role in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), especially in vasculopathic manifestations. While neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and low-density granulocytes (LDGs) have been described, the functional relevance of other subsets—such as naïve neutrophils, reverse transendothelial migration neutrophils (rTEM), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory neutrophils—and their association with vasculopathy remains unknown. Objective: We aimed to characterize the phenotypic and functional profile of neutrophil subsets and their association with vasculopathic manifestations in IIM, adjusting for disease activity. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, single-center study including 59 IIM patients diagnosed by muscle biopsy and fulfilling 2017 ACR/EULAR criteria. Flow cytometry was used to immunophenotype myeloid subsets, and functional assays assessed phagocytosis and respiratory burst. Patients were stratified by clinical activity and presence of vasculopathy. Results: Vasculopathic patients showed expansion of LDGs (p = 0.0092), granulocytic and monocytic MDSCs expressing Arginase-1 (p = 0.0078, p = 0.0003) and PD-L1 (p = 0.0258, p = 0.0087), and rTEM neutrophils (p = 0.0775). In contrast, they exhibited a reduction in naïve neutrophils (p = 0.0004), phagocytosis (p < 0.0001) and respiratory burst (p = 0.0006). Multivariate analysis identified naïve neutrophils and activated CD177+ neutrophils as independent predictors of vasculopathy. A positive correlation between activated and naïve neutrophils were observed in patients with vasculopathic features (r = 0.43; p < 0.05). Conclusions: IIM patients with vasculopathic features display a distinct immune profile characterized by an imbalance between proinflammatory and regulatory neutrophil subsets, alongside persistent functional impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrillo-Vázquez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: