Ethnographic study explores interaction, participation, and inclusion in telepresence robot classrooms, highlighting significant implications for education.
Telepresence robots are increasingly deployed in higher education to support participation when students cannot be physically co-present. Unlike conventional video-conferencing, telepresence robots enable embodied remote attendance by placing a mobile camera–microphone–screen device in the classroom that can be positioned, oriented, and driven by a remote participant. However, the promise of “being there” often collides with the interactional realities of classrooms, where participation depends on fine-grained coordination of talk, attention, and access to shared materials. We report findings from an ethnographic study of a graduate class in which telepresence robots were available for a full term alongside in-person attendance. Our analysis shows that inclusion is not delivered by the robot but accomplished through distributed labour by remote drivers, co-located peers, instructors, and supporting technologies. We conceptualise inclusion across three dimensions - operational, interactional, and pedagogical, showing how classrooms bridge the social–technical gap and informing telepresence design for education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: