Osteoimmunology of Natural and Synthetic Biomaterials Used in Dentistry for Bone Remodeling

Bone loss in the maxillofacial region arises from multiple causes, including periodontal disease, trauma, surgical procedures, infection, congenital anomalies, and cancer. Traditional treatment relies on bone grafting, either alone or in combination with biomaterials. Advances in tissue engineering have introduced synthetic or natural scaffolds to mimic the mineralized bone matrix. Natural scaffolds offer excellent biocompatibility and similarity to native tissue but often lack sufficient mechanical strength and exhibit poor degradation rates. Synthetic scaffolds provide tunable porosity and mechanical stability; however, their biological inertness makes them poor sources of osteogenic signaling. A key factor in the success of any scaffold is its interaction with the host immune system. Upon implantation, the innate immune response is initiated, with neutrophils and macrophages being the first cells to contact the scaffold. Macrophage polarization toward proinflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory (M2) phenotypes determines whether the microenvironment favors inflammation or remodeling. The adaptive immune response also plays a critical role: T and B lymphocytes may promote tolerance and integration through Th2/Treg pathways and antibody-mediated regulation, or they may trigger chronic inflammation and rejection through Th1/Th17 activation. This review examines the natural and synthetic materials used for bone remodeling and their biological properties. It then outlines the sequence of immune events occurring from the moment a scaffold is implanted to its potential integration or failure. Finally, this study highlights the relevance of cellular models and in vitro assays for the early evaluation of immunogenicity and biocompatibility, which are essential for optimizing scaffold design and improving outcomes in maxillofacial bone regeneration.