Exploratory qualitative study explores rheumatology professionals' views on prediction models, suggesting integration challenges.
Objectives Prediction models are increasingly developed to aid decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but none are currently included in guidelines. The aim of this study was to explore rheumatology healthcare professionals’ perceptions of using prediction models in everyday clinical practice. Methods An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with rheumatologists and nurse practitioners involved in RA care in the Netherlands. Participants were purposively sampled based on work experience, academic degree, profession, and care setting. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s framework. Results Fifteen interviews uncovered for overarching themes. First, building support for prediction models depended on trust, awareness, understanding of model inputs and limitations, perceived clinical usefulness, evidence, and cost-effectiveness. Second, making prediction models workable in routine care required integration into electronic health records, minimal additional workload, reliance on routinely collected data, and actionable outputs. Third, HCPs positioned prediction models within clinical judgment and patient care: models were considered valuable when supporting, rather than replacing, professional judgment and shared decision-making, while helping to communicate uncertainty and clarify difficult decisions. Fourth, HCPs anticipated consequences for care organisation, medication use, professional autonomy and personalised care, including concerns about misuse by external parties, compulsion, and unintended workload or loss of patient visibility. Conclusion Rheumatology healthcare professionals value prediction models, but only if they are interpretable, clearly beneficial, integrated into workflows, and protect professional autonomy. Addressing these concerns is essential for turning models into useful clinical decision tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fadaei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: