The paper addresses definitional clarity and strategic responses to digital transformation in service-oriented businesses, suggesting implications for practice.
Despite its ubiquity in management discourse, digital transformation (DT) remains one of the least precisely defined concepts in the field. This paper addresses two interrelated gaps: the lack of definitional clarity distinguishing DT from the related but narrower concepts of digitization and digitalization, and the insufficient theorization of how service-oriented businesses (SOBs) respond to DT strategically. Drawing on a narrative literature review, the paper first traces the conceptual progression from digitization through digitalization to full digital transformation, establishing a working definition anchored in fundamental, technology-enabled change to an organization’s value proposition. It then examines how SOBs adopt exploitative and explorative knowledge management strategies in response to DT pressures, and presents organizational ambidexterity as a framework for reconciling incremental optimization with radical innovation. The paper contributes a synthesized conceptual foundation suited to guiding both future empirical research and managerial practice in serviceintensive contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MĂRINCEAN et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: