Technical report presents MRRA, a framework improving decision traceability in role-specialized LLM ensembles, suggesting promising applications.
This technical report introduces MRRA (Marukoshiki Recursive Reasoning Architecture), an auditable reasoning-control architecture for role-specialized LLM ensembles. Unlike multi-agent debate frameworks optimized for consensus, convergence, or benchmark accuracy, MRRA focuses on decision traceability by combining problem reframing, triangulated role-based evaluation, structured interference analysis, assumption tracking, confidence capping, and conditional revision. MRRA is implemented as a state-machine-based control framework with three core layers: Problem Reframer, Triangulated Evaluator, and Revision Controller. The framework uses an Interference Layer to classify cross-role outputs into Agreement, Conflict, Complement, and Absence / Absent Warning, and maintains an Assumption Registry to preserve decision-relevant assumptions, unresolved risks, and minority warnings. The report includes two case studies: a trading strategy evaluation and a web access-control decision. Both cases demonstrate how MRRA converts multi-LLM reasoning into auditable decision evidence by surfacing critical assumptions, preserving absent warnings, activating confidence caps, and producing conditional recommendations rather than forcing premature consensus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshifumi Maruko (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: