Comparative Analysis of Paving Blocks Reinforced with Pineapple Leaf Fiber (Ananas comosus) and Sisal Fiber (Agave sisalana)

Infrastructure expansion in Indonesia has increased demand for paving blocks, raising concerns over cement production costs and environmental impact. This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of pineapple leaf fiber (PALF, Ananas comosus) and sisal fiber (Agave sisalana) as reinforcements in paving blocks, evaluating water absorption and 28-day compressive strength at fiber contents of 0%, 1%, 3%, 5%, and 7% by cement volume. A full-factorial two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD was employed. A dosage of 3% for both fiber types resulted in compressive strengths of 14.5 MPa (PALF, +59% vs. control) and 15.2 MPa (sisal, +67% vs. control), both of which met the requirements of SNI 03-0691-1996 Class B. Sisal fiber demonstrated superior compressive performance, consistent with its higher stiffness and tensile strength as reported in the literature. Water absorption increased monotonically with fiber content for both types, with SNI Class D compliance (≤10%) maintained only at 0% for PALF and 0–1% for sisal, a known consequence of the inherently hydrophilic nature of plant-based natural fibers. A statistically significant interaction term (F = 3.697, p = 0.012) confirmed that the two fibers respond differently to dosage increases, providing nuanced practical guidance beyond what single-factor studies can offer. These findings demonstrate the promising compressive strength of agricultural waste fiber-reinforced paving blocks, warranting further investigation of abrasion resistance, flexural strength, and long-term durability before practical deployment. Such utilization supports circular economy principles in the construction industry.