Analysis reveals how subcontractor establishments face greater employment instability than non-subcontractors, indicating structural issues in labor dynamics.
Many jobs in the twenty-first century have become short-term, precarious, and unstable. To help explain this phenomenon, I consider the fragmentation of economic activity across networks of transacting organizations—a trend known to affect pay, but with unknown implications for the stability of work. I focus on a key part of this trend: the growing role of subcontracting. Combining research on the reasons for subcontracting with organizational theories of dependence and diversification, I argue that many subcontractor establishments face volatile demand and have few margins to cut costs other than labor. These factors compound to destabilize work for employees. Drawing on restricted-access French microdata, I show that employment at subcontractor establishments is substantially more unstable than elsewhere. I then trace this instability to key features of their organizational structure. Subcontractors employ a narrower range of occupations, are less profitable, and spend a greater share of their total expenses on labor than do non-subcontractors. Together, these attributes can account for almost two fifths of subcontractors’ excess employment instability. Finally, I show how subcontractor establishments are less able to insulate their employees from swings in demand. Following a drop in revenue, the employees of subcontractor establishments are more likely to exit than are those of non-subcontractor establishments. These findings demand a richer view of employment instability, entailing not only the demise of conventional employment practices—the focus of much recent research—but also the function and structure of organizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clem Aeppli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: