Key result
Community structural heart care matches VA satisfaction, though ~79% of veterans prefer VA hospitals.
Why the study?
Veterans' preferences regarding specialty care in the community versus within the VA system under the MISSION Act remained unexplored.
Does referral to community hospitals for structural heart disease care under the MISSION Act affect veteran satisfaction and care preferences compared to VA-based care?
Cross-Sectional (n=47)
No
Does referral to community hospitals for structural heart disease care under the MISSION Act affect veteran satisfaction and care preferences compared to VA-based care?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.15% vs 9.19%
p-value: p=0.876
Despite high satisfaction with community-based structural heart disease care under the MISSION Act, veterans maintain a strong preference for VA-based care for their general healthcare needs.
High veteran preference for VA care may guide resource allocation; small cross-sectional sample leaves open validation in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND: The MISSION Act of 2018 expanded veterans' access to necessary care at non-Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities. The policy is intended to improve access to timely, high-quality care-particularly for specialized procedures like transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, veterans' preferences regarding specialty care in the community vs within the VA system remain unexplored. METHODS: This cross-sectional quality improvement study surveyed veterans at an urban VA heart center who received referrals to community hospitals between 2018 and 2023 for structural heart disease care. The 14-item survey evaluated satisfaction across 3 key domains-communication, quality, and care coordination-along with overall satisfaction with community and VA care, and preferences for future care delivery settings. RESULTS: Of 47 veterans who completed the survey, most (78.7%) preferred receiving care at a VA hospital (P < .0001). Veterans reported high satisfaction with both community (mean score 9.15/10) and VA-based care (9.19/10; P = .876). While 64% preferred the VA for future cardiovascular care, this trend did not reach statistical significance (P = .079). In contrast, 78.7% preferred the VA for general healthcare (P < .001). Satisfaction with community care was most strongly associated with staff competence (r = 0.839) and feeling their concerns were heard (r = 0.818). VA satisfaction correlated most strongly with care coordination (r = 0.789) and clear follow-up instructions (r = 0.729). Transportation challenges were reported by 17% of respondents and were significantly associated with preference for community care for general health (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Veterans referred for cardiovascular procedures through the MISSION Act reported high satisfaction across settings but expressed a clear preference for VA-based care for general healthcare. These findings suggest that while community care is a valuable tool for improving access, investments in VA-based services remain critical to meeting veteran expectations and preserving care quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Structural heart disease (n=47). Community care vs. VA-based care was evaluated on Satisfaction score (out of 10) (p=0.876). Veterans referred for structural heart disease care reported high satisfaction with both community (9.15/10) and VA-based care (9.19/10), though 78.7% preferred receiving care at a VA hospital.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: