Key result
Tai Chi fails to improve walk distance over standard care despite better HF symptom scores.
RCT (n=52)
parallel group
No
Authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of Tai Chi on exercise tolerance in patients with moderate heart failure. DESIGN: Randomised parallel group study balanced for baseline variables. SETTING: Cardiology Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 52 patients (42 men, mean age (68.9 years), range (46-90 years), and 10 women, mean age (70.0 years), range (58-82)) with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association symptom class II-III) were studied. Patients were randomised to Tai Chi Chuan twice a week for 16 weeks or to standard medical care without exercise rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the change in the distance walked in the shuttle walk test. Secondary outcome measures were changes in symptom scores and quality of life indices. RESULTS: Objective measures of exercise tolerance did not improve significantly with Tai Chi, but patients having Tai Chi exercise had an improvement in symptom scores of heart failure measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (comparison of deltas, -2.4 control vs -14.9; p = 0.01), and depression scores measured by the SCL-90-R questionnaire (-2.9 vs -6.8; p = 0.12) compared with those patients in the control group. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic heart failure, 16 weeks of Tai Chi training was safe, with no adverse exercise related problems. It was enjoyed by all taking part and led to significant improvements in symptoms and quality of life.
Barrow et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-III) (n=52). Tai Chi Chuan vs. standard medical care without exercise rehabilitation was evaluated on change in the distance walked in the shuttle walk test. Tai Chi Chuan for 16 weeks did not significantly improve shuttle walk test distance, but improved heart failure symptom scores compared to standard medical care (deltas -14.9 vs -2.4; p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: