Key result
Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks significantly reduced preoperative pain by a mean difference of 2.26 on a 0-10 visual analogue scale compared to conventional systemic analgesia in patients with hip fractures.
Why the study?
Prior systematic reviews linked landmark- or nerve stimulation-guided peripheral nerve blocks to reduced pain and systemic analgesia in hip fracture patients, but the effect of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks needed investigation.
Does ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block reduce preoperative pain and opioid consumption in adult patients with hip fractures compared to conventional systemic analgesia?
Systematic Review (n=976)
Does ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block reduce preoperative pain and opioid consumption in adult patients with hip fractures compared to conventional systemic analgesia?
Mean Difference: -2.26 (95% CI -2.97–-1.55)
p-value: p=<0.001
Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks significantly reduce preoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients with hip fractures compared to conventional systemic analgesia, though the quality of evidence is low.
Supports ultrasound-guided blocks for hip fracture preoperative analgesia; meta-analysis of RCTs confirms pain and opioid reduction with safety benefits.
Systematic reviews associate peripheral nerve blocks based on anatomic landmarks or nerve stimulation with reduced pain and need for systemic analgesia in hip fracture patients. We aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks compared to conventional analgesia for preoperative pain management in hip fractures. Five databases were searched until June 2021 to identify randomised controlled trials. Two independent authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data was pooled for meta-analysis and quality of evidence was evaluated using Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We included 12 trials (976 participants) comparing ultrasound-guided nerve blocks to conventional systemic analgesia. In favour of ultrasound, pain measured closest to two hours after block placement decreased with a mean difference of -2.26 (VAS 0 to 10); (p < 0.001) 95% CI [-2.97 to -1.55]. In favour of ultrasound, preoperative analgesic usage of iv. morphine equivalents in milligram decreased with a mean difference of -5.34 (p=0.003) 95% CI [-8.11 to -2.58]. Time from admission until surgery ranged from six hours to more than three days. Further, ultrasound-guided nerve blocks may be associated with a lower frequency of delirium: risk ratio 0.6 (p = 0.03) 95% CI [0.38 to 0.94], fewer serious adverse events: risk ratio 0.33 (p = 0.006) 95% CI [0.15 to 0.73] and higher patient satisfaction: mean difference 25.9 (VAS 0 to 100) (p < 0.001) 95% CI [19.74 to 32.07]. However, the quality of evidence was judged low or very low. In conclusion, despite low quality of evidence, ultrasound-guided blocks were associated with benefits compared to conventional systemic analgesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Exsteen et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Hip fractures (n=976). Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks vs. Conventional systemic analgesia was evaluated on Pain after block placement measured closest to two hours before surgery (VAS 0 to 10) (MD -2.26, 95% CI -2.97 to -1.55, p=<0.001). Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks significantly reduced preoperative pain by a mean difference of 2.26 on a 0-10 visual analogue scale compared to conventional systemic analgesia in patients with hip fractures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: