Key result
AI differentiates SVT mechanisms on 12-lead ECGs with ~0.91 AUC, outperforming experienced electrophysiologists.
Why the study?
Definitively distinguishing supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms from 12-lead ECG alone remains difficult, and machine learning may improve identification by detecting visually imperceptible changes.
Does a convolutional neural network improve the identification of SVT mechanisms from 12-lead ECGs compared to experienced electrophysiologists in patients with SVT?
Observational (n=725)
No
Does a convolutional neural network improve the identification of SVT mechanisms from 12-lead ECGs compared to experienced electrophysiologists in patients with SVT?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.909 (95% CI 0.874-0.934)
A convolutional neural network can accurately differentiate SVT mechanisms from 12-lead ECGs, achieving higher sensitivity than experienced electrophysiologists at matched specificities.
May aid ECG-based SVT mechanism prediction; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: It remains difficult to definitively distinguish supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) mechanisms using a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) alone. Machine learning may identify visually imperceptible changes on 12-lead ECGs and may improve ability to determine SVT mechanisms. Objective: We sought to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) that identifies the SVT mechanism according to the gold standard of SVT ablation and to compare CNN performance against experienced electrophysiologists among patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT), and atrial tachycardia (AT). Methods: All patients with 12-lead surface ECG during sinus rhythm and SVT and had successful SVT ablation from 2013 to 2020 were included. A CNN was trained using data from 1505 surface ECGs that were split into 1287 training and 218 test ECG datasets. We compared the CNN performance against independent adjudication by 2 experienced cardiac electrophysiologists on the test dataset. Results: Our dataset comprised 1505 ECGs (368 AVNRT, 304 AVRT, 95 AT, and 738 sinus rhythm) from 725 patients. The CNN areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for AVNRT, AVRT, and AT were 0.909, 0.867, and 0.817, respectively. When fixing the specificity of the CNN to the electrophysiologist adjudicators' specificity, the CNN identified all SVT classes with higher sensitivity: (1) AVNRT (91.7% vs 65.9%), (2) AVRT (78.4% vs 63.6%), and (3) AT (61.5% vs 50.0%). Conclusion: A CNN can be trained to differentiate SVT mechanisms from surface 12-lead ECGs with high overall performance, achieving similar performance to experienced electrophysiologists at fixed specificities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higuchi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Supraventricular tachycardia (n=725). Convolutional neural network analysis of surface 12-lead ECGs vs. Independent adjudication by experienced cardiac electrophysiologists was evaluated on Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AUC 0.909, 95% CI 0.874-0.934). A convolutional neural network accurately identified supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms from 12-lead ECGs, achieving AUCs up to 0.909 and higher sensitivity than experienced electrophysiologists.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: